🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” said Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “following international guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch states the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative said: “The corporation runs its operations according with current country statutes. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The company was “not against rules”, the representative commented, mentioning that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to accomplish desired population health targets, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which encompasses growing volumes of black market activity”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.